Validation of an instrument that evaluates investigative skills and technological tools for research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36958/sep.v6i2.188Keywords:
research skills, technology tools, validityAbstract
OBJECTIVE: determine the validity of the instrument developed to measure investigative skills integrated into six dimensions that are: methodological, search, citation, data analysis, writing of conclusions and presentation; and the technological tools for research integrated into six dimensions that are: search, citation, tabulation and presentation of data, writing and communication. METHOD: content validity was determined through expert judgment applying the Lawshe Model and reliability through a pilot test applying the Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient. RESULTS: in relation to content validity, all items obtained a score greater than 0.582, which indicates that they are adequate; in terms of reliability, a Cronbach's Alpha of .952 and .811 respectively was obtained for each variable. With which there is a robust instrument in validity
and reliability to be applied. CONCLUSION: the study determines that there is content validity and reliability in the instrument so it can be applied in research for the established purposes that are aimed at evaluating the student's perception in relation to the investigative skills and technological tools for research that used, according to the variables and dimensions contemplated.
Downloads
References
Andreu, P., Grégori, K., Rivas, L., Trejo, M., Vásquez, B., y Zarceño, A. (2020). Gestión curricular de programas de maestrías de la UCA: Una mirada a las dinámicas para el desarrollo de habilidades investigativas. Investigaciones UCA Memoria Bienal, 1(1), 139-143. https://uca.edu.sv/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/investigaciones-UCA-memoria-bienal-2019-2020.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.51378/iuca.v1i1.6865
Angulo, G., Vidal, C., Vengoechea, J., Gordon, Y., y Gutiérrez, C. (2019). Habilidades de Razonamiento Científico y Patrones de uso de las Herramientas y Recursos de Tecnología de la Información y Comunicación (TIC) en Estudiantes Universitarios. En REDINE (Ed.). Conference Proceedings EDUNOVATIC 2019. (pp. 100-104). http://www.edunovatic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/EDUNOVATIC19.pdf
Barbachán, E., Casimiro, W., Casimiro, C., Pacovilca, O., Pacovilca, G., y Gudiño, C. (2021). Habilidades investigativas en estudiantes de áreas tecnológicas. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 13(4), 218-225. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/2159
Coaquira, N. (2021). Relación entre habilidades investigativas y gestión en salud en enfermeras de la Red de Salud Arequipa-Caylloma. Revista Cubana de Enfermería, 37(3), 1-20. http://www.revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/4137
Cortés, M., y López, A. (2019). Evaluación sobre las competencias digitales de los alumnos del Sistema Universitario del Adulto Mayor, Universidad de Guadalajara, México. En REDINE (Ed.). Conference Proceedings EDUNOVATIC 2019. (pp. 230-235). http://www.edunovatic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/EDUNOVATIC19.pdf
Escobar-Pérez, J. y Cuervo - Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: Una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27–36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302438451_Validez_de_contenido_y_juicio_de_expertos_Una_aproximacion_a_su_utilizacion
Galibert, M., Attorresi, H., Abal, F., Lozzia, G., y Aguerri, M. (2009). Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem. Conceptos básicos y aplicaciones para la medición de constructos psicológicos. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, XVIII (2), 179-188. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281921792007
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México, McGraw-Hill Education.
Oviedo, H. y Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34 (4), 572-580. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74502005000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso
Salinas, P. y Cárdenas, M. (2009). Métodos de investigación social. Editorial Quipus, CIESPAL, 2da. Edición, Quito. https://biblio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/catalog/resGet.php?resId=55376
Sánchez, L., Melián, H., Quiroz, M., Dueñas, Y., Suárez, A., y Rojas, Y. (2018). Habilidades investigativas en estudiantes de 2do año de Licenciatura en Enfermería: ocasión para su desarrollo. EDUMECENTRO, 10(1), 55-72. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/edu/v10n1/edu04118.pdf
Tristán-López, A. (2008). Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Avances en Medición, 6, 37–48. https://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/lab_psicometria/application/files/9716/0463/3548/VOL_6._Articulo4_Indice_de_validez_de_contenido_37-48.pdf
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nancy Gabrieal Agustin Barrios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- The authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right of the first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons 4.0 attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work already the first publication in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work it was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to share their work online (for example: in institutional repositories or personal web pages) before and during the manuscript submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, more and more quick citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
